CGS e.s. unit to Coulomb per second
CGS ESU
C/s
Conversion History
| Conversion | Reuse | Delete |
|---|---|---|
1 CGS ESU (CGS e.s. unit) → 3.335641e-10 C/s (Coulomb per second) Just now |
Quick Reference Table (CGS e.s. unit to Coulomb per second)
| CGS e.s. unit (CGS ESU) | Coulomb per second (C/s) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 0.0000000003335641 |
| 10 | 0.000000003335641 |
| 100 | 0.00000003335641 |
| 1,000,000 | 0.0003335641 |
| 1,000,000,000 | 0.3335641 |
| 3,000,000,000 | 1.0006923 |
About CGS e.s. unit (CGS ESU)
The CGS electrostatic unit (CGS e.s. unit) of current equals approximately 3.335641×10⁻¹⁰ amperes, identical to the statampere or ESU of current. In the CGS electrostatic subsystem, current is defined as statcoulombs per second, giving one CGS e.s. unit per second of charge flow. The CGS-ESU system places Coulomb s law in a clean constant-free form but produces cumbersome dimensions for magnetic quantities. It was used in early electrostatics, cathode-ray tube physics, and vacuum science. All modern work uses SI. The factor 1/c (in CGS cm/s) converts ESU current to SI amperes.
1 CGS e.s. unit ≈ 3.336×10⁻¹⁰ A. A 1 A current equals about 3×10⁹ CGS e.s. units — illustrating the enormous scale difference between the ESU and SI systems.
About Coulomb per second (C/s)
The coulomb per second (C/s) is a derived SI expression for electric current that makes the physical definition explicit: one ampere is exactly one coulomb of charge passing a point per second. The relationship I = Q/t links current (A), charge (C), and time (s). While C/s and A are numerically identical and dimensionally equivalent, the C/s form appears in physics textbooks and dimensional analyses where the derivation from charge and time is instructive rather than treating the ampere as primitive. In calculations tracking charge accumulation — capacitor discharge, electroplating, or battery coulomb-counting — expressing current in C/s clarifies the unit chain.
A capacitor delivering 1 C of charge over 1 second discharges at exactly 1 C/s = 1 A. A 500 mA USB charger transfers 0.5 C of charge each second.
CGS e.s. unit – Frequently Asked Questions
Why is the CGS e.s. unit so different in magnitude from the CGS e.m. unit?
The e.m. unit equals 10 A while the e.s. unit equals 3.3 × 10⁻¹⁰ A — a ratio of about 3 × 10¹⁰, which is the speed of light in cm/s. This enormous factor reflects the fundamental relationship c² = 1/(ε₀μ₀). The two systems were designed to simplify different sets of equations, and the speed of light is the price of bridging them.
What made the CGS electrostatic system useful for early vacuum physics?
In vacuum tubes and cathode ray experiments, electrostatic forces dominate — no magnetic materials, no currents in bulk conductors. The ESU system made Coulomb's law beautifully simple: F = q₁q₂/r² with no constants. For computing electron trajectories in early TV tubes and oscilloscopes, this simplicity was genuinely helpful.
How did early CRT televisions use electrostatic units in beam deflection design?
Early cathode ray tubes used electrostatic deflection plates to steer the electron beam. Engineers working in CGS-ESU could calculate beam deflection angles directly from plate voltage and geometry using Coulomb's law without extra constants. The tiny ESU currents matched the actual beam currents (microamperes), making the numbers more intuitive than working in amperes for these minuscule electron flows.
How do I know if an old paper is using CGS e.s. or CGS e.m. units?
Check the context and the magnitude of numbers. If currents are tiny numbers where you would expect amperes, it is ESU. If they are 1/10 of expected ampere values, it is EMU. Good papers state which system they use, but many older ones do not. The equations themselves also differ — look for factors of c or 4π.
Could the CGS electrostatic system handle magnetic phenomena?
Technically yes, but clumsily. In pure CGS-ESU, the magnetic field has dimensions involving the speed of light, and equations for inductance and magnetic force become awkward. This is exactly why the Gaussian hybrid was invented — it uses ESU for electric quantities and EMU for magnetic ones, giving clean equations for both.
Coulomb per second – Frequently Asked Questions
Why bother writing coulombs per second when it is just amperes?
In dimensional analysis and physics derivations, C/s makes the relationship between charge and current explicit. When you are computing how much silver an electroplating bath deposits (Faraday's law), writing current as C/s reminds you that charge = current × time, which directly gives the mass deposited.
How many electrons is one coulomb?
One coulomb is approximately 6.242 × 10¹⁸ electrons — about 6.2 quintillion. At 1 C/s (1 A), that many electrons pass a point in your wire every single second. A USB cable charging your phone at 2 A carries 12.5 quintillion electrons per second. The numbers are staggering but the charges are tiny.
Is coulombs per second used in any real-world instrument or specification?
Not directly — every instrument reads in amperes or milliamperes. But coulomb-counting battery fuel gauges internally track charge in coulombs by integrating current over time: ∫I dt. The C/s framing appears in battery management system firmware and electrochemistry literature where charge balance matters.
How does Faraday's law of electrolysis use coulombs to predict metal deposition?
Faraday discovered that the mass of metal deposited at an electrode is directly proportional to the total charge passed (in coulombs). For silver, 107.87 grams deposit per 96,485 C (one Faraday). So a 10 A electroplating bath running for 1 hour passes 36,000 C and deposits about 40 g of silver. Thinking in C/s makes the calculation: current × time × atomic weight / (valence × 96,485).
How does coulomb counting work in battery management systems?
A shunt resistor or Hall sensor continuously measures current flowing in and out of the battery. The BMS integrates this current over time (summing C/s × Δt) to track net charge. Drift and measurement errors accumulate, so smart BMS designs periodically recalibrate against voltage-based state-of-charge estimates.