EMU of current to Franklin second

EMU stands for "electromagnetic unit." In the 1860s–1870s, physicists needed separate unit systems for electrostatic and electromagnetic phenomena because they had not yet unified them. The EMU system was built around magnetic force between currents, while the ESU system was built around Coulomb's electrostatic force. The ratio between them turned out to be the speed of light — a clue that led to Maxwell's equations.

Yes, exactly. Both equal 10 amperes. The biot is the named unit; "EMU of current" is the generic label. It is like saying "SI unit of force" versus "newton" — same thing, different label. The CGS-EMU system also has named units for other quantities: the gauss (magnetic field), the oersted (magnetising field), and the maxwell (magnetic flux).

The EMU system was awkward for practical electrical engineering — 1 EMU of resistance (the abohm) equals 10⁻⁹ ohms, making everyday values absurdly large numbers. The SI system, adopted in 1960, unified mechanical and electrical units into one coherent framework with human-scale values. Practicality won over tradition.

Pre-1960 physics journals, particularly in geomagnetism, plasma physics, and early electrical standards work, routinely use EMU. Geophysicists measuring Earth's magnetic field historically reported results in CGS-EMU units (gauss, oersted, EMU). Some geophysics reference data still has not been converted to SI.

Weber and Kohlrausch discovered in 1856 that the ratio of the ESU to EMU charge was approximately 3×10¹⁰ cm/s — the speed of light. This was no coincidence: Maxwell showed that light is an electromagnetic wave, and the unit ratio reflects the fundamental coupling between electric and magnetic fields. One of the greatest insights in physics history, hidden in a unit conversion.

Franklin (1706–1790) was the American polymath who proved lightning is electrical with his famous kite experiment in 1752. He introduced the convention of "positive" and "negative" charge that we still use today. He arbitrarily assigned positive to the charge on glass rubbed with silk — which turned out to be a deficit of electrons, giving us the unfortunate convention that current flows opposite to electron motion.

The roentgen (R) was defined in 1928 as the radiation exposure producing 1 ESU of charge (1 franklin ≈ 3.336 × 10⁻¹⁰ C) per cm³ of dry air at STP. This CGS-era definition stuck because radiation safety regulations were already built around it. Even though the SI gray replaced the roentgen for dosimetry, the roentgen — and its franklin-based definition — persists in US regulatory and medical imaging contexts.

The legacy unit of radiation exposure, the roentgen (R), is defined as the amount of X-ray or gamma radiation that produces 1 esu of charge (1 franklin) per cubic centimeter of dry air at STP. This definition dates from the 1920s when CGS-ESU was standard. Modern dosimetry uses grays and sieverts, but the roentgen and its franklin-based definition persist in some medical and regulatory contexts.

One Fr/s is about 0.33 nanoamperes — less current than a sleeping microcontroller draws. To equal the 1 A flowing through a phone charger cable, you would need about 3 billion franklins per second. The unit is spectacularly impractical for anything beyond electrostatics calculations.

Sort of. He labelled the charge on glass rubbed with silk as "positive," not knowing it was caused by removing electrons. When Thomson discovered the electron in 1897, it turned out electrons carry what Franklin called negative charge. So conventional current flows from + to −, opposite to actual electron flow. Engineers and physicists have lived with this "mistake" for over 250 years.