ESU of current to Franklin second
ESU
Fr.s
Conversion History
| Conversion | Reuse | Delete |
|---|---|---|
1 ESU (ESU of current) → 1 Fr.s (Franklin second) Just now |
Quick Reference Table (ESU of current to Franklin second)
| ESU of current (ESU) | Franklin second (Fr.s) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1 |
| 10 | 10 |
| 100 | 100 |
| 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
| 1,000,000,000 | 1,000,000,000 |
| 3,000,000,000 | 3,000,000,000 |
About ESU of current (ESU)
The electrostatic unit of current (ESU, also called the statampere) equals approximately 3.335641×10⁻¹⁰ amperes. It is the current unit of the CGS electrostatic system (CGS-ESU), in which Coulomb s law is written without a permittivity constant and electromagnetic quantities are derived from the statcoulomb (franklin). One statampere is the flow of one statcoulomb per second. The factor 3.336×10⁻¹⁰ arises because 1 A = (c/10) ESU, where c ≈ 3×10¹⁰ cm/s is the speed of light in CGS units. The CGS-ESU system was used in early electrostatics and vacuum tube physics but is entirely obsolete in applied engineering.
1 ESU of current ≈ 3.336×10⁻¹⁰ A — an extraordinarily small current. One ordinary ampere equals approximately 3×10⁹ ESU.
About Franklin second (Fr.s)
The franklin per second (Fr/s) equals approximately 3.335641×10⁻¹⁰ amperes. The franklin (Fr), also called the statcoulomb, is the CGS-ESU unit of electric charge; one franklin per second of charge flow constitutes one statampere of current. The conversion factor arises from c/10 in CGS (where c ≈ 3×10¹⁰ cm/s), linking the ESU and SI charge systems. The franklin itself honors Benjamin Franklin, whose experiments established the convention of positive and negative electric charge. The unit appears in older electrostatics and radiation dosimetry literature and is otherwise of historical interest only.
1 Fr/s ≈ 3.336×10⁻¹⁰ A. One ampere of current corresponds to approximately 3×10⁹ franklin per second.
ESU of current – Frequently Asked Questions
Why is the ESU of current so absurdly small compared to an ampere?
The ESU system was designed to make Coulomb's electrostatic law simple (no constants), which means its charge unit (the statcoulomb) is tiny relative to the coulomb. Since current is charge per time, the statampere inherits that smallness. One ampere is about 3 billion statamperes — the speed of light (in cm/s) divided by 10 shows up in the conversion.
What is a statampere and is it the same as an ESU of current?
Yes, the statampere and the ESU of current are exactly the same unit: approximately 3.336 × 10⁻¹⁰ A. "Statampere" is the named form; "ESU of current" is the descriptive form. The "stat-" prefix comes from "electrostatic," just as "ab-" prefix in the EMU system comes from "absolute."
What role did the ESU system play in the discovery that light is electromagnetic?
When Weber and Kohlrausch measured the ratio of ESU to EMU charge in 1856, they got a number suspiciously close to the speed of light — about 3×10¹⁰ cm/s. Maxwell realized this was no coincidence: it meant electromagnetic disturbances propagate at light speed, proving light itself is an electromagnetic wave. A unit conversion exercise led to one of the greatest discoveries in physics.
What practical problem did the ESU system solve for 19th-century telegraph engineers?
Telegraph cables behaved like long capacitors — charge stored along the line distorted signals over transatlantic distances. The ESU system, built around Coulomb's law, made capacitance calculations straightforward: no permittivity constants, just geometry and charge. William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) used ESU-based analysis to diagnose and fix signal distortion on the first transatlantic telegraph cables in the 1860s.
Why were electrostatic and electromagnetic measurements historically done in separate labs?
Electrostatic experiments (rubbing rods, Leyden jars, spark gaps) involved high voltages and tiny charges, while electromagnetic work (coils, galvanometers, telegraph lines) involved low voltages and large currents. The equipment, techniques, and even the physicists were different. Each community built units natural to their measurements — ESU for electrostatics, EMU for electromagnetics — and it took decades after Maxwell to unify them into one coherent SI framework.
Franklin second – Frequently Asked Questions
Who was Benjamin Franklin and why is a charge unit named after him?
Franklin (1706–1790) was the American polymath who proved lightning is electrical with his famous kite experiment in 1752. He introduced the convention of "positive" and "negative" charge that we still use today. He arbitrarily assigned positive to the charge on glass rubbed with silk — which turned out to be a deficit of electrons, giving us the unfortunate convention that current flows opposite to electron motion.
Why is the franklin still referenced in the definition of the roentgen radiation unit?
The roentgen (R) was defined in 1928 as the radiation exposure producing 1 ESU of charge (1 franklin ≈ 3.336 × 10⁻¹⁰ C) per cm³ of dry air at STP. This CGS-era definition stuck because radiation safety regulations were already built around it. Even though the SI gray replaced the roentgen for dosimetry, the roentgen — and its franklin-based definition — persists in US regulatory and medical imaging contexts.
Why does the franklin appear in radiation dosimetry?
The legacy unit of radiation exposure, the roentgen (R), is defined as the amount of X-ray or gamma radiation that produces 1 esu of charge (1 franklin) per cubic centimeter of dry air at STP. This definition dates from the 1920s when CGS-ESU was standard. Modern dosimetry uses grays and sieverts, but the roentgen and its franklin-based definition persist in some medical and regulatory contexts.
How does franklin per second compare to everyday currents?
One Fr/s is about 0.33 nanoamperes — less current than a sleeping microcontroller draws. To equal the 1 A flowing through a phone charger cable, you would need about 3 billion franklins per second. The unit is spectacularly impractical for anything beyond electrostatics calculations.
Did Benjamin Franklin actually get the sign of electric charge wrong?
Sort of. He labelled the charge on glass rubbed with silk as "positive," not knowing it was caused by removing electrons. When Thomson discovered the electron in 1897, it turned out electrons carry what Franklin called negative charge. So conventional current flows from + to −, opposite to actual electron flow. Engineers and physicists have lived with this "mistake" for over 250 years.