Gilbert to CGS e.s. unit
Gi
CGS ESU
Conversion History
| Conversion | Reuse | Delete |
|---|---|---|
1 Gi (Gilbert) → 2385673398.30634066133016112945 CGS ESU (CGS e.s. unit) Just now |
Quick Reference Table (Gilbert to CGS e.s. unit)
| Gilbert (Gi) | CGS e.s. unit (CGS ESU) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 | 238,567,339.83063406613601403748 |
| 0.5 | 1,192,836,699.15317033065009094204 |
| 1 | 2,385,673,398.30634066133016112945 |
| 2 | 4,771,346,796.6126813226603222589 |
| 5 | 11,928,366,991.53170330662082640188 |
| 10 | 23,856,733,983.06340661324165280376 |
| 100 | 238,567,339,830.63406613232659030153 |
About Gilbert (Gi)
The gilbert (Gi) equals 10/(4π) amperes — approximately 0.7958 A — and is the CGS-EMU unit of magnetomotive force (MMF) rather than a general-purpose current unit. In magnetic circuit analysis, MMF drives magnetic flux through a reluctance, analogously to how voltage drives current through resistance. A single-turn coil carrying 1 Gi of MMF passes 0.7958 A. In SI, magnetomotive force is measured in ampere-turns (A·T). The gilbert is obsolete but historically significant in transformer design, relay engineering, and magnetic circuit analysis dating from the late 19th century through the 1960s.
A relay coil requiring 2 Gi of MMF to actuate needs about 1.6 A·turn in SI terms. Vintage transformer and relay datasheets from the 1940s–1960s often specify MMF in gilberts.
Etymology: Named after William Gilbert (1544–1603), English physician and natural philosopher who authored De Magnete (1600), the first systematic scientific study of magnetism and electricity, establishing that the Earth itself acts as a giant magnet.
About CGS e.s. unit (CGS ESU)
The CGS electrostatic unit (CGS e.s. unit) of current equals approximately 3.335641×10⁻¹⁰ amperes, identical to the statampere or ESU of current. In the CGS electrostatic subsystem, current is defined as statcoulombs per second, giving one CGS e.s. unit per second of charge flow. The CGS-ESU system places Coulomb s law in a clean constant-free form but produces cumbersome dimensions for magnetic quantities. It was used in early electrostatics, cathode-ray tube physics, and vacuum science. All modern work uses SI. The factor 1/c (in CGS cm/s) converts ESU current to SI amperes.
1 CGS e.s. unit ≈ 3.336×10⁻¹⁰ A. A 1 A current equals about 3×10⁹ CGS e.s. units — illustrating the enormous scale difference between the ESU and SI systems.
Gilbert – Frequently Asked Questions
Why is the gilbert approximately 0.7958 amperes and not a round number?
The gilbert equals 10/(4π) amperes because the CGS-EMU system uses a different form of Ampere's law where the factor 4π appears explicitly rather than being absorbed into μ₀. This "unrationalised" form distributes 4π differently in the equations, producing the 1/(4π) factor when converting to SI's "rationalised" system.
What is magnetomotive force and how is it different from regular current?
MMF is the magnetic analogue of voltage — it drives flux through a magnetic circuit the way EMF drives current through an electrical circuit. For a coil, MMF = N × I (turns times current). A 100-turn coil carrying 1 A has 100 ampere-turns of MMF. In CGS, that same MMF would be about 125.7 gilberts.
Who was William Gilbert and why does he deserve a unit?
Gilbert (1544–1603) was physician to Queen Elizabeth I and author of De Magnete (1600), the first true scientific investigation of magnetism. He demonstrated that Earth is a magnet, distinguished magnetic from electrostatic attraction, and coined the word "electricus." He did all this 87 years before Newton's Principia — a genuine pioneer of experimental science.
Where would I find gilberts used today?
Practically nowhere in new designs. You might encounter gilberts in vintage relay and transformer datasheets from the 1940s–1960s, in older American and European magnetic component catalogs, or in classic electrical engineering textbooks. Any modern magnetic circuit analysis uses ampere-turns (A·T) for MMF.
How do I convert gilberts to ampere-turns?
Multiply gilberts by 10/(4π) ≈ 0.7958 to get ampere-turns. Wait — that is backwards. Multiply gilberts by 0.7958 to get amperes for a single-turn coil. For MMF conversion: 1 gilbert = 0.7958 ampere-turns. So a relay spec of 5 Gi needs about 4 ampere-turns to actuate — for instance, 4 turns at 1 A or 8 turns at 0.5 A.
CGS e.s. unit – Frequently Asked Questions
Why is the CGS e.s. unit so different in magnitude from the CGS e.m. unit?
The e.m. unit equals 10 A while the e.s. unit equals 3.3 × 10⁻¹⁰ A — a ratio of about 3 × 10¹⁰, which is the speed of light in cm/s. This enormous factor reflects the fundamental relationship c² = 1/(ε₀μ₀). The two systems were designed to simplify different sets of equations, and the speed of light is the price of bridging them.
What made the CGS electrostatic system useful for early vacuum physics?
In vacuum tubes and cathode ray experiments, electrostatic forces dominate — no magnetic materials, no currents in bulk conductors. The ESU system made Coulomb's law beautifully simple: F = q₁q₂/r² with no constants. For computing electron trajectories in early TV tubes and oscilloscopes, this simplicity was genuinely helpful.
How did early CRT televisions use electrostatic units in beam deflection design?
Early cathode ray tubes used electrostatic deflection plates to steer the electron beam. Engineers working in CGS-ESU could calculate beam deflection angles directly from plate voltage and geometry using Coulomb's law without extra constants. The tiny ESU currents matched the actual beam currents (microamperes), making the numbers more intuitive than working in amperes for these minuscule electron flows.
How do I know if an old paper is using CGS e.s. or CGS e.m. units?
Check the context and the magnitude of numbers. If currents are tiny numbers where you would expect amperes, it is ESU. If they are 1/10 of expected ampere values, it is EMU. Good papers state which system they use, but many older ones do not. The equations themselves also differ — look for factors of c or 4π.
Could the CGS electrostatic system handle magnetic phenomena?
Technically yes, but clumsily. In pure CGS-ESU, the magnetic field has dimensions involving the speed of light, and equations for inductance and magnetic force become awkward. This is exactly why the Gaussian hybrid was invented — it uses ESU for electric quantities and EMU for magnetic ones, giving clean equations for both.