Block to Exabit

Modern hard drives (2011+) and SSDs use 4,096-byte (4 KiB) physical sectors — known as "Advanced Format" or AF. Legacy drives used 512-byte sectors. Filesystems (NTFS, ext4, APFS) typically use 4 KiB logical block sizes to match physical sectors, which avoids the performance penalty of misaligned writes. Enterprise SSDs may use larger block sizes (16 KiB or more) for better parallelism.

Cloud block storage services (AWS EBS, Azure Managed Disks, GCP Persistent Disk) use I/O block sizes typically of 4 KiB or 16 KiB. Performance is measured in IOPS (I/O operations per second) and throughput (MB/s) — both depend on block size. A throughput-optimized workload (sequential video) benefits from large blocks; an IOPS-optimized workload (database random reads) uses small blocks.

Filesystems allocate disk space in whole blocks. On a system with 4 KiB blocks, every file — no matter how small — occupies at least 4,096 bytes. A directory of 10,000 small configuration files (each 100 bytes of content) uses 40 MB of disk space (10,000 × 4,096 bytes) rather than 1 MB (10,000 × 100 bytes). This is called "block slack" or "internal fragmentation".

Disk blocks (filesystem blocks) are typically 512 bytes to 4 KiB. Database blocks (database pages) are the unit of I/O for a database engine — typically 8 KiB (PostgreSQL, SQL Server), 16 KiB (MySQL InnoDB), or 32 KiB (Oracle, configurable). Database blocks usually align to multiples of disk blocks for efficiency. Reading one database page may involve reading 2–8 disk blocks.

RAID stripe size (or chunk size) is the amount of data written to each drive before moving to the next drive in the array — typically 64 KiB to 512 KiB. It should be set to match your workload: sequential large-file workloads benefit from larger stripe sizes; random small-block workloads benefit from stripe sizes closer to the filesystem block size. Mismatched stripe and block sizes cause write amplification and reduce RAID performance.

One exabit = 10¹⁸ bits = 125,000 terabytes = 125 petabytes. If every person on Earth (8 billion people) each stored 15 GB of data — roughly a modern smartphone's photos and messages — the total would be about 120 exabytes, or about 960 exabits. The entire human genome is about 1.5 GB; sequencing every person on Earth would produce about 12 exabytes of data.

Cisco's annual internet traffic reports estimated global IP traffic at roughly 4.8 exabytes per day in 2022, rising about 20% per year. Expressed in bits, that's about 38 exabits per day or roughly 440 petabits per second continuously. Video streaming accounts for over 60% of total internet traffic volume.

Data gravity is the principle that massive datasets attract applications, services, and additional data toward them — rather than being moved to where processing occurs. At exabit scale, physically transferring data becomes impractical: moving 1 exabit over a 100 Gbps link takes 116 days. Instead, companies deploy compute resources alongside the data. This effect drives cloud concentration — once an organisation stores exabits in AWS or Azure, the cost and latency of moving that data elsewhere creates powerful vendor lock-in, shaping the economics of the entire cloud industry.

The Square Kilometer Array (SKA), under construction in Australia and South Africa, will be the world's largest radio telescope. Its thousands of antennas will collectively produce roughly 1 exabit of raw sensor data per day — more than the entire global internet traffic of the early 2000s. This data cannot be stored in full; instead, on-site supercomputers reduce it by a factor of ~10,000 in real time, keeping only scientifically relevant signals. The SKA illustrates how radio astronomy pushes data processing to extreme scales that rival commercial internet infrastructure.

At 1 Gbps (a fast home connection), downloading 1 exabit would take 1 billion seconds — about 31.7 years. At 1 Tbps (a high-end data center link), it would take 1 million seconds, or about 11.6 days. This illustrates why exabit-scale data movements require massively parallel infrastructure — no single link or device handles exabit transfers directly.