Block to Tebibyte

Modern hard drives (2011+) and SSDs use 4,096-byte (4 KiB) physical sectors — known as "Advanced Format" or AF. Legacy drives used 512-byte sectors. Filesystems (NTFS, ext4, APFS) typically use 4 KiB logical block sizes to match physical sectors, which avoids the performance penalty of misaligned writes. Enterprise SSDs may use larger block sizes (16 KiB or more) for better parallelism.

Cloud block storage services (AWS EBS, Azure Managed Disks, GCP Persistent Disk) use I/O block sizes typically of 4 KiB or 16 KiB. Performance is measured in IOPS (I/O operations per second) and throughput (MB/s) — both depend on block size. A throughput-optimized workload (sequential video) benefits from large blocks; an IOPS-optimized workload (database random reads) uses small blocks.

Filesystems allocate disk space in whole blocks. On a system with 4 KiB blocks, every file — no matter how small — occupies at least 4,096 bytes. A directory of 10,000 small configuration files (each 100 bytes of content) uses 40 MB of disk space (10,000 × 4,096 bytes) rather than 1 MB (10,000 × 100 bytes). This is called "block slack" or "internal fragmentation".

Disk blocks (filesystem blocks) are typically 512 bytes to 4 KiB. Database blocks (database pages) are the unit of I/O for a database engine — typically 8 KiB (PostgreSQL, SQL Server), 16 KiB (MySQL InnoDB), or 32 KiB (Oracle, configurable). Database blocks usually align to multiples of disk blocks for efficiency. Reading one database page may involve reading 2–8 disk blocks.

RAID stripe size (or chunk size) is the amount of data written to each drive before moving to the next drive in the array — typically 64 KiB to 512 KiB. It should be set to match your workload: sequential large-file workloads benefit from larger stripe sizes; random small-block workloads benefit from stripe sizes closer to the filesystem block size. Mismatched stripe and block sizes cause write amplification and reduce RAID performance.

TB (terabyte) = 10¹² bytes = 1,000,000,000,000 bytes (SI decimal). TiB (tebibyte) = 2⁴⁰ bytes = 1,099,511,627,776 bytes (IEC binary). TiB is 9.95% larger. The practical consequence: a 1 TB hard drive (decimal) holds 0.9095 TiB. This 10% gap is the primary reason drive capacity appears lower in the OS than on the box.

ZFS and Btrfs are copy-on-write filesystems designed for TiB-scale pools with built-in features that traditional filesystems lack. ZFS supports inline deduplication — a 10 TiB pool with 40% duplicate data might show 6 TiB of logical usage but only consume 3.6 TiB physically. Btrfs offers transparent compression (zstd), where a 4 TiB dataset of compressible log files might occupy only 1–2 TiB on disk. Both support snapshots that initially consume zero extra space, growing only as data diverges. These features make "used space in TiB" surprisingly complex to report accurately.

Yes. Linux tools (df -h, lsblk) display storage in IEC binary units: KiB, MiB, GiB, TiB. df -h output showing "1.8T" for a 2 TB drive is reporting 1.8 TiB. Modern Linux distributions correctly label these as TiB in technical contexts. This is one of the areas where Linux is more technically precise than Windows or consumer storage labels.

RAID arrays lose capacity to redundancy: RAID 1 mirrors two drives (50% efficiency); RAID 5 loses one drive worth of capacity; RAID 6 loses two drives. A 4-drive RAID 5 array of 2 TB drives has 3 × 2 TB = 6 TB raw usable (decimal), ≈ 5.46 TiB, minus filesystem overhead. Enterprise storage also reserves space for spares, snapshots, and wear levelling, further reducing usable TiB.

No. A tebibyte (TiB) = 2⁴⁰ bytes = 1,099,511,627,776 bytes — about 1.1 trillion bytes. Exactly one trillion bytes = 10¹² bytes = 1 terabyte (TB, decimal). The tebibyte is approximately 10% larger than a trillion bytes. "Terabyte" is often casually used to mean "1 trillion bytes"; "tebibyte" is the precise binary equivalent at 1,024 gibibytes.