Exabit to Exbibit

One exabit = 10¹⁸ bits = 125,000 terabytes = 125 petabytes. If every person on Earth (8 billion people) each stored 15 GB of data — roughly a modern smartphone's photos and messages — the total would be about 120 exabytes, or about 960 exabits. The entire human genome is about 1.5 GB; sequencing every person on Earth would produce about 12 exabytes of data.

Cisco's annual internet traffic reports estimated global IP traffic at roughly 4.8 exabytes per day in 2022, rising about 20% per year. Expressed in bits, that's about 38 exabits per day or roughly 440 petabits per second continuously. Video streaming accounts for over 60% of total internet traffic volume.

Data gravity is the principle that massive datasets attract applications, services, and additional data toward them — rather than being moved to where processing occurs. At exabit scale, physically transferring data becomes impractical: moving 1 exabit over a 100 Gbps link takes 116 days. Instead, companies deploy compute resources alongside the data. This effect drives cloud concentration — once an organisation stores exabits in AWS or Azure, the cost and latency of moving that data elsewhere creates powerful vendor lock-in, shaping the economics of the entire cloud industry.

The Square Kilometer Array (SKA), under construction in Australia and South Africa, will be the world's largest radio telescope. Its thousands of antennas will collectively produce roughly 1 exabit of raw sensor data per day — more than the entire global internet traffic of the early 2000s. This data cannot be stored in full; instead, on-site supercomputers reduce it by a factor of ~10,000 in real time, keeping only scientifically relevant signals. The SKA illustrates how radio astronomy pushes data processing to extreme scales that rival commercial internet infrastructure.

At 1 Gbps (a fast home connection), downloading 1 exabit would take 1 billion seconds — about 31.7 years. At 1 Tbps (a high-end data center link), it would take 1 million seconds, or about 11.6 days. This illustrates why exabit-scale data movements require massively parallel infrastructure — no single link or device handles exabit transfers directly.

An exabit (Ebit) = 10¹⁸ bits (SI decimal). An exbibit (Eibit) = 2⁶⁰ bits ≈ 1.1529 × 10¹⁸ bits (IEC binary). Exbibit is 15.29% larger — the cumulative product of using 1,024 instead of 1,000 at each of six prefix steps. This is the largest practically relevant SI vs IEC gap for bit units in current storage contexts.

Exbibit is used in: computer science academic literature on exascale computing, theoretical storage system design papers, and formal IEC/IEEE standards. No commercial product, OS, or consumer application currently displays exbibits. It is primarily a unit for academic and standards consistency — ensuring the IEC prefix family extends uniformly from kibi- to exbi- (and beyond to zebi- and yobi-).

After exbibit (Eibit, 2⁶⁰ bits) come: zebibit (Zibit, 2⁷⁰ bits) and yobibit (Yibit, 2⁸⁰ bits). These are defined in the IEC 80000-13 standard but have no current practical applications. The IEC binary prefix family deliberately mirrors the SI prefix family, ensuring consistent naming as computing scale continues to grow.

Frontier (Oak Ridge, 2022) achieved 1.194 exaFLOPS, with its Slingshot-11 fabric moving data at aggregate rates measurable in exbibits per second across 9,408 nodes. Aurora (Argonne, 2024) targets similar throughput with over 63,000 GPUs. At these scales, a single checkpoint of a full-system simulation can exceed 1 Eibit of state data, making exbibit a natural unit for describing I/O bandwidth requirements.

The IEC currently defines up to yobibit (Yibit, 2⁸⁰ bits). In 2022, the SI system added ronna- (10²⁷) and quetta- (10³⁰), but the IEC has not yet created matching binary prefixes (ronnibit? quettibit?). With global data creation projected to exceed 1 yottabit annually by the 2030s, pressure is mounting for the IEC to extend the binary prefix family — though the naming convention ("ronnibi-"?) remains an open question.