Abvolt to Statvolt
abV
stV
Conversion History
| Conversion | Reuse | Delete |
|---|---|---|
1 abV (Abvolt) → 0.00000000003335641 stV (Statvolt) Just now · Rounding: Up to 8 significant figures | Recalculate this conversion using your current rounding settings. |
Quick Reference Table (Abvolt to Statvolt)
| Abvolt (abV) | Statvolt (stV) |
|---|---|
| 1,000 | 0.00000003335641 |
| 10,000 | 0.0000003335641 |
| 100,000 | 0.000003335641 |
| 1,000,000 | 0.00003335641 |
| 100,000,000 | 0.003335641 |
Results rounded to a maximum of 8 significant figures
About Abvolt (abV)
The abvolt (abV) is the CGS-EMU (electromagnetic unit) unit of electric potential, equal to exactly 10⁻⁸ volts. It derives from the CGS electromagnetic unit system in which the base units of length, mass, and time are the centimeter, gram, and second, and the unit of current (abampere) equals 10 amperes. The abvolt is consequently tiny — 100 million abvolts equal one volt. It is now obsolete in practical engineering and has been replaced by the SI volt everywhere, but appears in older physics literature, pre-1960s electromagnetism textbooks, and CGS-system derivations in theoretical physics and materials science papers.
One volt equals 100,000,000 abvolts. The abvolt is no longer used in practice; it appears mainly in historical physics texts and CGS-system derivations.
Etymology: The prefix "ab-" denotes the CGS absolute electromagnetic unit system, formalised by the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1873. Each electromagnetic CGS unit carried the "ab-" prefix to distinguish it from the practical units (volt, ampere, ohm) and from the Gaussian/electrostatic units (statvolt, statampere).
About Statvolt (stV)
The statvolt (stV) is the CGS-ESU and Gaussian unit of electric potential, defined as one erg per statcoulomb. This converter uses the traditional CGS-to-SI mapping of 1 stV to 299.792458 V — close to 300 V. The factor is c × 10⁻⁶, using the numerical speed of light c = 299,792,458 in m/s. Multiply the statvolt value by 299.792458 to obtain volts; divide the volt value by that factor to obtain statvolts. This conventional mapping is not a claim of an exact physical conversion to the post-2019 SI. The statvolt is used in Gaussian-unit theoretical physics — plasma physics, astrophysics, and quantum field theory papers — where the CGS-Gaussian system simplifies Maxwell's equations.
One statvolt equals approximately 299.8 V. A mains voltage of 230 V corresponds to about 0.767 statvolts. The statvolt appears in Gaussian-unit plasma and astrophysics literature.
Etymology: The prefix "stat-" denotes the CGS electrostatic unit system (from "static electricity"). The statvolt was defined when the Gaussian CGS system was formalised in the 19th century, unifying electrostatic and electromagnetic phenomena through the speed of light as the conversion factor between ESU and EMU quantities.
Abvolt – Frequently Asked Questions
Why is 100 million abvolts equal to just one volt?
The CGS electromagnetic system uses centimeters, grams, and seconds as base units instead of meters, kilograms, and seconds. When you derive the unit of voltage from these smaller base units, the resulting "natural" voltage unit comes out absurdly small — 10⁻⁸ V. This is not a flaw but a consequence of the choice of base units: the CGS system was designed to make electromagnetic equations simpler (no factors of 4π or μ₀ in certain formulas), and the price was impractical unit sizes. The abvolt is to the volt what a grain of sand is to a boulder.
Did anyone actually use abvolts in real laboratory work?
Rarely in isolation. Physicists working in the CGS-EMU system in the late 19th and early 20th centuries used abvolts in theoretical derivations and internal calculations, but they almost always converted results to "practical" units (volts, amperes, ohms) for publication and laboratory records. The practical units were specifically designed by the British Association for the Advancement of Science in the 1860s–1870s as convenient multiples of the CGS units. The volt was defined as exactly 10⁸ abvolts precisely so that real-world voltages would have sensible numerical values.
What is the difference between the abvolt and the statvolt?
They come from two different CGS subsystems. The abvolt belongs to CGS-EMU (electromagnetic units), where the unit of current (abampere = 10 A under the traditional mapping) is defined by magnetic force. The statvolt belongs to CGS-ESU (electrostatic units), where the unit of charge (statcoulomb) is defined by Coulomb's law. Under the traditional mapping used here, 1 statvolt maps to c × 10⁻⁶ volts = 299.792458 V, using the numerical speed of light c = 299,792,458 in m/s, while 1 abvolt maps to 10⁻⁸ V. Their ratio is the numerical speed of light in cm/s: one statvolt equals 29,979,245,800 abvolts. These are conventional SI mappings, not claims of exact physical conversions to the post-2019 SI.
Why did physics have two competing CGS unit systems in the first place?
Because electricity and magnetism were studied as separate phenomena before Maxwell unified them in the 1860s. Electrostatics researchers defined units based on Coulomb's force law (ESU system), while magnetism researchers defined units based on Ampère's force law (EMU system). Each system made its own equations clean but produced incompatible units for shared quantities like voltage and charge. Gaussian units tried to merge both by using ESU for electric quantities and EMU for magnetic ones, with the speed of light as the bridge. SI finally resolved the mess by treating the ampere as a base unit independent of mechanical units.
How did the British Association for the Advancement of Science decide on the CGS base units?
In 1861, a committee led by William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) and James Clerk Maxwell chose centimeter, gram, and second as base units because they were already standard in laboratory physics. They then derived "absolute" electromagnetic units — the abvolt, abampere, abohm — from mechanical force equations. The resulting unit sizes were wildly impractical (the abvolt is 10⁻⁸ V), so the same committee created "practical" multiples: the volt (10⁸ abvolts), ampere (0.1 abampere), and ohm (10⁹ abohms). These practical units eventually became SI, while the absolute units faded into textbook footnotes.
Statvolt – Frequently Asked Questions
Why is one statvolt approximately 300 volts — where does that number come from?
The traditional mapping used by this converter is 299.792458 V per statvolt: the numerical speed of light in meters per second divided by 10⁶. The statvolt is one erg per statcoulomb, so its voltage mapping is consistent with the traditional electrostatic charge and current mappings. The value is exact within the selected convention; it is not an exact physical correspondence to the post-2019 SI, where vacuum permeability and permittivity are experimentally determined. The near-round number 300 comes from the speed of light being close to 3 × 10⁸ m/s.
Why do some converters show a slightly different statvolt conversion factor?
A converter may use a rounded factor, the fixed pre-2019 CGS-to-SI mapping, or a modern measured mapping. The 2019 SI redefinition made vacuum permeability and permittivity measured quantities rather than exact SI constants, so physical CGS-to-SI electrical conversions now have uncertainty. This converter uses the pre-2019 factor of 299.792458 V per statvolt and does not model that measurement uncertainty. Different final digits are not automatically a bug: compare the conventions and rounding first. Separately, non-terminating decimal divisions can be rounded during calculation. That numerical rounding is distinct from uncertainty in measured physical constants.
Which physics disciplines still use the Gaussian unit system that includes statvolts?
Plasma physics, astrophysics, and parts of theoretical high-energy physics. Gaussian units make Maxwell's equations look symmetric — E and B fields have the same dimensions, which simplifies many derivations. The journal Physical Review used Gaussian units as the default until surprisingly recently. Astrophysicists describing pulsar magnetospheres, interstellar electric fields, and cosmic ray acceleration often work in Gaussian units because the equations for relativistic electromagnetic phenomena are cleaner. If you see an electric field quoted in "statvolts per centimeter" in a modern paper, it is almost certainly astrophysics or plasma physics.
How do you convert an electric field from statvolts per centimeter to volts per meter?
Under the traditional mapping used here, multiply by 29,979.2458 (approximately 30,000). One stV/cm maps to 299.792458 V / 0.01 m = 29,979.2458 V/m. You must handle both the voltage mapping (stV → V, factor of approximately 300) and the length conversion (cm → m, factor of 100) separately. Thus an electric field of 1 stV/cm maps to approximately 30 kV/m.
Why do some physicists insist Gaussian units are "more natural" than SI?
In SI, Coulomb's law has a factor of 1/(4πε₀) and the Biot–Savart law has μ₀/(4π). In Gaussian units, both constants disappear — replaced by the dimensionless 1 and the speed of light c. Maxwell's equations in Gaussian form have a beautiful symmetry: ∇×E = −(1/c)∂B/∂t and ∇×B = (1/c)∂E/∂t (in vacuum). E and B have the same units, which reflects the fact that they are components of a single relativistic tensor. SI obscures this by giving them different dimensions. The cost is unit conversion headaches, but for theoretical work where insight matters more than engineering numbers, many physicists prefer the elegance.
What is the connection between statvolts and the fine-structure constant?
In Gaussian CGS units, the fine-structure constant α = e²/(ℏc) ≈ 1/137, where e is the electron charge in statcoulombs (4.803 × 10⁻¹⁰ stC). The simplicity is the point — no ε₀, no 4π. The energy of a hydrogen atom's ground state is −(1/2)α²mₑc², and the classical electron radius is α²a₀ (where a₀ is the Bohr radius). All these expressions are cleaner in Gaussian units because the statvolt and statcoulomb absorb the electromagnetic coupling constants. This is why Feynman, Schwinger, and most mid-20th-century theoretical physicists worked in Gaussian units — the physics is more visible when the unit scaffolding is minimal.