Watt per ampere to Abvolt
W/A
abV
Conversion History
| Conversion | Reuse | Delete |
|---|---|---|
1 W/A (Watt per ampere) → 100000000 abV (Abvolt) Just now |
Quick Reference Table (Watt per ampere to Abvolt)
| Watt per ampere (W/A) | Abvolt (abV) |
|---|---|
| 1.5 | 150,000,000 |
| 5 | 500,000,000 |
| 12 | 1,200,000,000 |
| 24 | 2,400,000,000 |
| 120 | 12,000,000,000 |
| 230 | 23,000,000,000 |
About Watt per ampere (W/A)
The watt per ampere (W/A) is a derived SI expression that is dimensionally and numerically identical to the volt: one watt per ampere equals exactly one volt, since power equals voltage times current (P = VI). It appears in engineering formulas and datasheets when authors wish to emphasize the power-to-current relationship rather than the potential difference itself — for example, in specifying the back-EMF constant of a motor or the open-circuit efficiency of a solar cell. No separate measurement scale exists; any instrument measuring volts also measures watts per ampere. The W/A notation is most common in motor and generator specifications, power electronics, and electromechanical system analysis.
A motor with a back-EMF constant of 12 W/A generates 12 V of back-EMF per ampere of current — directly equivalent to 12 V.
About Abvolt (abV)
The abvolt (abV) is the CGS-EMU (electromagnetic unit) unit of electric potential, equal to exactly 10⁻⁸ volts. It derives from the CGS electromagnetic unit system in which the base units of length, mass, and time are the centimeter, gram, and second, and the unit of current (abampere) equals 10 amperes. The abvolt is consequently tiny — 100 million abvolts equal one volt. It is now obsolete in practical engineering and has been replaced by the SI volt everywhere, but appears in older physics literature, pre-1960s electromagnetism textbooks, and CGS-system derivations in theoretical physics and materials science papers.
One volt equals 100,000,000 abvolts. The abvolt is no longer used in practice; it appears mainly in historical physics texts and CGS-system derivations.
Etymology: The prefix "ab-" denotes the CGS absolute electromagnetic unit system, formalised by the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1873. Each electromagnetic CGS unit carried the "ab-" prefix to distinguish it from the practical units (volt, ampere, ohm) and from the Gaussian/electrostatic units (statvolt, statampere).
Watt per ampere – Frequently Asked Questions
If watts per ampere equals volts, why does the unit even exist?
It exists because in some engineering contexts, the power-to-current ratio is the quantity you actually measure or specify. A motor datasheet might list back-EMF as "12 W/A at rated speed" because the engineer measured shaft power and winding current separately and divided. Writing the result as "12 V" would be numerically identical but would obscure the measurement method. Similarly, fuel cell and solar cell efficiency curves are sometimes plotted as W/A to emphasize power extraction per unit current. The unit is a dimensional identity (like N·m and J for torque vs energy) — same dimensions, different conceptual emphasis.
How does the W/A relationship show up in motor specifications?
Every DC motor has a back-EMF constant (Ke), expressed in volts per radian per second — or equivalently watts per ampere. When the motor spins, it generates a voltage proportional to speed that opposes the supply voltage. At no load, back-EMF nearly equals supply voltage and current drops to almost zero. Under heavy load, the motor slows, back-EMF drops, and current rises. The Ke constant ties these together: a motor rated at 0.05 W/A (or V/(rad/s)) spinning at 3000 RPM generates about 15.7 V of back-EMF. Motor designers use W/A when characterising the electromechanical energy conversion efficiency.
Does Ohm's law have anything to do with watts per ampere?
Indirectly, yes. Ohm's law says V = IR, and power is P = VI = I²R. Dividing power by current gives P/I = I²R/I = IR = V. So watts per ampere always reduces to volts through Ohm's law. But W/A is more general than Ohm's law — it holds even in non-ohmic devices like diodes, LEDs, and solar cells where V ≠ IR. The LED in your desk lamp might drop 3.2 V (= 3.2 W/A) at 20 mA, but that ratio changes with current because the device is nonlinear. W/A is a snapshot of the operating point, not a material constant like resistance.
Can you measure watts per ampere directly, or do you always compute it?
You always compute it — there is no "W/A meter." You measure power (with a wattmeter or by multiplying voltage and current) and current (with an ammeter or current clamp), then divide. In practice, most engineers just measure voltage directly with a voltmeter, since the result is identical. The W/A route is useful when you have a power measurement but not a direct voltage measurement — for instance, when characterising a generator's electrical output using a dynamometer (which measures mechanical power) and a current sensor.
Are there other "hidden volt" units like watts per ampere?
Several. Joules per coulomb (J/C) is the definition of the volt: one joule of energy per coulomb of charge. Webers per second (Wb/s) equals volts by Faraday's law of induction — the voltage induced in a loop equals the rate of change of magnetic flux. Kilograms times meters squared per ampere per second cubed (kg·m²·A⁻¹·s⁻³) is the volt in base SI units. These are all the same physical quantity viewed through different lenses: energy per charge, flux change rate, or fundamental dimensions. Physics has one underlying reality but many equivalent ways to slice it.
Abvolt – Frequently Asked Questions
Why is 100 million abvolts equal to just one volt?
The CGS electromagnetic system uses centimeters, grams, and seconds as base units instead of meters, kilograms, and seconds. When you derive the unit of voltage from these smaller base units, the resulting "natural" voltage unit comes out absurdly small — 10⁻⁸ V. This is not a flaw but a consequence of the choice of base units: the CGS system was designed to make electromagnetic equations simpler (no factors of 4π or μ₀ in certain formulas), and the price was impractical unit sizes. The abvolt is to the volt what a grain of sand is to a boulder.
Did anyone actually use abvolts in real laboratory work?
Rarely in isolation. Physicists working in the CGS-EMU system in the late 19th and early 20th centuries used abvolts in theoretical derivations and internal calculations, but they almost always converted results to "practical" units (volts, amperes, ohms) for publication and laboratory records. The practical units were specifically designed by the British Association for the Advancement of Science in the 1860s–1870s as convenient multiples of the CGS units. The volt was defined as exactly 10⁸ abvolts precisely so that real-world voltages would have sensible numerical values.
What is the difference between the abvolt and the statvolt?
They come from two different CGS subsystems. The abvolt belongs to CGS-EMU (electromagnetic units), where the unit of current (abampere = 10 A) is defined by magnetic force. The statvolt belongs to CGS-ESU (electrostatic units), where the unit of charge (statcoulomb) is defined by Coulomb's law. The ratio between them is the speed of light: 1 statvolt = c × 10⁻⁶ volts ≈ 299.8 V, while 1 abvolt = 10⁻⁸ V. So one statvolt equals about 29.98 billion abvolts. The two systems produce wildly different unit sizes because one is optimized for magnetism and the other for electrostatics.
Why did physics have two competing CGS unit systems in the first place?
Because electricity and magnetism were studied as separate phenomena before Maxwell unified them in the 1860s. Electrostatics researchers defined units based on Coulomb's force law (ESU system), while magnetism researchers defined units based on Ampère's force law (EMU system). Each system made its own equations clean but produced incompatible units for shared quantities like voltage and charge. Gaussian units tried to merge both by using ESU for electric quantities and EMU for magnetic ones, with the speed of light as the bridge. SI finally resolved the mess by treating the ampere as a base unit independent of mechanical units.
How did the British Association for the Advancement of Science decide on the CGS base units?
In 1861, a committee led by William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) and James Clerk Maxwell chose centimeter, gram, and second as base units because they were already standard in laboratory physics. They then derived "absolute" electromagnetic units — the abvolt, abampere, abohm — from mechanical force equations. The resulting unit sizes were wildly impractical (the abvolt is 10⁻⁸ V), so the same committee created "practical" multiples: the volt (10⁸ abvolts), ampere (0.1 abampere), and ohm (10⁹ abohms). These practical units eventually became SI, while the absolute units faded into textbook footnotes.