Calorie (th) to Inch-Pound

cal (th)

1 cal (th)

in·lb

37.03152039091293938959 in·lb

Conversion History

ConversionReuseDelete
No conversion history to show.

Entries per page:

0–0 of 0


Quick Reference Table (Calorie (th) to Inch-Pound)

Calorie (th) (cal (th))Inch-Pound (in·lb)
137.03152039091293938959
1003,703.15203909129393895907
1,00037,031.52039091293938959074
4,184154,939.88131557973840604767
10,000370,315.20390912939389590744
100,0003,703,152.03909129393895907443

About Calorie (th) (cal (th))

The thermochemical calorie (cal th) is defined as exactly 4.184 joules — the amount of heat needed to raise one gram of water by one degree Celsius under controlled conditions. It was standardized in 1935 by the US National Bureau of Standards for use in thermochemical measurements. The thermochemical calorie differs slightly from the International Table calorie (4.1868 J) and the 15°C calorie (4.18580 J). It is primarily used in chemistry for reporting heats of reaction and combustion.

One thermochemical calorie is the energy needed to warm 1 mL of water by 1 °C. The heat of combustion of glucose is about 670 kcal (th) per mole.

About Inch-Pound (in·lb)

The inch-pound (in·lb) is a unit of torque and small-scale energy used in US customary mechanical engineering, equal to approximately 0.11299 joules. It represents the work done by one pound-force over a distance of one inch, or equivalently, a torque of one pound-force acting at a radius of one inch. Small fastener torque specifications, precision instrument settings, and electronic component assembly instructions routinely use inch-pounds. It is 1/12 of a foot-pound.

A laptop hinge torque specification is often 2–5 in·lb. Small machine screws in electronics are typically torqued to 1–4 in·lb.


Calorie (th) – Frequently Asked Questions

The thermochemical calorie (cal th) is defined as exactly 4.184 joules; the International Table calorie (cal IT) is exactly 4.1868 joules — a difference of 0.066%. The thermochemical value was fixed by the US National Bureau of Standards in 1935 for chemistry; the IT value was adopted for steam tables. In nutritional contexts, the difference is irrelevant, but in precise calorimetry it can matter.

Decades of published thermochemical data — heats of formation, bond energies, combustion enthalpies — are recorded in cal th and kcal th. Converting every reference table to joules would be error-prone and disruptive. Biochemistry textbooks still quote ATP hydrolysis at ~7.3 kcal/mol and glucose oxidation at ~686 kcal/mol. The convention persists because the existing literature is too vast to rewrite.

A dried, weighed food sample is sealed in a steel vessel filled with pure oxygen, submerged in a known mass of water. An electric spark ignites the sample, which burns completely. The temperature rise of the surrounding water — measured to 0.001°C — gives the total heat released. One degree rise per gram of water equals one calorie. Corrections for the heat capacity of the bomb itself, the ignition wire, and acid formation give results accurate to ±0.1%. Atwater then applied digestibility factors to convert bomb values to usable food energy.

Hydrogen releases about 34,000 cal th per gram; methane about 13,300 cal th/g; ethanol about 7,100 cal th/g; and glucose about 3,720 cal th/g. These values appear throughout chemistry textbooks as standard reference data. The higher the cal/g value, the more energy-dense the fuel — which is why hydrogen is attractive despite being hard to store.

Before 1935, the calorie was defined by water's heat capacity, which varies with temperature — the 15°C calorie, 20°C calorie, and mean calorie all differed slightly. The US National Bureau of Standards ended the ambiguity by defining the thermochemical calorie as exactly 4.184 J, a round value close to all the experimental variants. This gave chemists a fixed, reproducible conversion factor independent of water's quirky temperature-dependent heat capacity.

Inch-Pound – Frequently Asked Questions

Inch-pounds provide finer resolution for small fasteners where foot-pound values would be fractions (e.g., 3 in·lb vs 0.25 ft·lb). Electronics assembly, firearms scope mounting, and bicycle component installation all specify inch-pounds because over-torquing a small screw by even one foot-pound can strip threads or crack housings.

On an M3 screw into aluminum (spec: 5 in·lb), exceeding by 2 in·lb — a 40% overload — can strip the threads or crack a thin boss. Small fasteners have almost no safety margin because the thread engagement area is tiny and the materials (plastic, aluminum, brass) are soft. This is why electronics repair shops use beam-type or preset click torque drivers accurate to ±0.5 in·lb, and why aerospace assembly procedures treat inch-pound specs as hard limits, not suggestions.

Laptop hinge screws typically require 2–5 in·lb, hard drive mounting screws 2–4 in·lb, and motherboard standoff screws 5–8 in·lb. Going beyond the spec risks cracking plastic bosses or stripping soft aluminum threads. A precision bit driver with a torque limiter is essential for electronics repair work.

Dimensionally they are identical — force times distance — but context differs. As torque, 1 in·lb means one pound-force applied at one inch from a pivot. As energy, it means one pound-force pushing through one inch of linear displacement (0.11299 J). In practice, inch-pounds almost always refer to torque in mechanical specifications.

Scope rings and bases use small screws that are easily damaged, and consistent clamping force is critical for zero retention under recoil. Typical specs are 15–25 in·lb for ring screws and 30–65 in·lb for base screws. Under-torquing lets the scope shift; over-torquing cracks the scope tube or strips the screw. A dedicated inch-pound torque wrench is considered essential kit for precision rifle setup.

© 2026 TopConverters.com. All rights reserved.