Electron Volt to Kilocalorie (nutritional)
eV
kcal
Conversion History
| Conversion | Reuse | Delete |
|---|---|---|
| No conversion history to show. | ||
Quick Reference Table (Electron Volt to Kilocalorie (nutritional))
| Electron Volt (eV) | Kilocalorie (nutritional) (kcal) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 0 |
| 10 | 0 |
| 100 | 0 |
| 1,000 | 0.00000000000000000004 |
| 1,000,000 | 0.00000000000000003827 |
| 1,000,000,000 | 0.00000000000003826733 |
About Electron Volt (eV)
An electron volt (eV) is the kinetic energy gained by a single electron accelerating through an electric potential difference of one volt — equal to approximately 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ joules. It is the natural energy unit of particle physics, atomic physics, and chemistry, where joules would yield unwieldy powers of 10. Photon energies, ionisation energies, bandgaps in semiconductors, and masses of subatomic particles (via E = mc²) are all expressed in eV, keV, MeV, or GeV.
Visible light photons carry 1.8–3.1 eV of energy. The proton rest mass is 938 MeV. The Large Hadron Collider accelerates protons to 6.5 TeV (6.5 × 10¹² eV).
About Kilocalorie (nutritional) (kcal)
The nutritional kilocalorie (kcal) is equal to 4,186.8 joules (the International Table definition) and is the practical energy unit for human nutrition and dietetics. In everyday speech, this is what most people mean by "calorie" — the unit shown on food packaging in the EU, UK, and many other countries. Daily energy intake recommendations, exercise energy expenditure, and basal metabolic rate are all expressed in kcal. The difference between kcal th (4,184 J) and kcal nutritional (4,186.8 J) is 0.067% — irrelevant for dietary purposes.
A slice of bread contains about 80 kcal. The average adult needs 1,600–2,500 kcal/day depending on sex, age, and activity level.
Electron Volt – Frequently Asked Questions
Why do particle physicists use electron volts instead of joules?
Because subatomic energies in joules have absurdly small exponents — a visible-light photon carries about 3 × 10⁻¹⁹ J, but a convenient 1.9 eV. The electron volt is scaled to the quantum world, making numbers human-readable. It also doubles as a mass unit (via E = mc²): a proton is 938.3 MeV/c², far easier to work with than 1.673 × 10⁻²⁷ kg.
How much energy in electron volts does visible light carry?
Visible light photons range from about 1.65 eV (deep red, 750 nm) to 3.1 eV (violet, 400 nm). Green light, where the human eye is most sensitive, sits around 2.3 eV. Ultraviolet photons start at 3.1 eV and can exceed 100 eV in the extreme UV. These energies are why UV can damage DNA (breaking molecular bonds of 3–5 eV) while visible light cannot.
What is the relationship between electron volts and semiconductor bandgaps?
A semiconductor's bandgap — the minimum energy to free an electron from its bond — is expressed in eV. Silicon has a bandgap of 1.12 eV, gallium arsenide 1.42 eV, and gallium nitride 3.4 eV. The bandgap determines which wavelengths of light a solar cell can absorb and what color an LED emits. Lower bandgap means longer-wavelength (redder) light.
How many electron volts does the Large Hadron Collider produce?
The LHC accelerates protons to 6.5 TeV (6.5 × 10¹² eV) per beam, giving collisions a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. That sounds enormous, but 13 TeV is only about 2 microjoules — the kinetic energy of a flying mosquito. The power of the LHC lies in concentrating that energy into a space a million times smaller than an atom.
How do you convert electron volts to joules?
Multiply by 1.602 176 634 × 10⁻¹⁹. So 1 eV = 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ J, 1 keV = 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁶ J, and 1 MeV = 1.602 × 10⁻¹³ J. This conversion factor is exactly the elementary charge in coulombs, because an electron volt is defined as the energy gained by one electron charge crossing one volt of potential.
Kilocalorie (nutritional) – Frequently Asked Questions
How many kilocalories should I eat per day to lose weight?
Most weight-loss guidelines recommend a deficit of 500 kcal/day below your maintenance level, which typically means 1,200–1,800 kcal/day for most adults. A 500 kcal/day deficit yields roughly 0.45 kg (1 lb) of fat loss per week, since one kilogram of body fat stores about 7,700 kcal. Going below 1,200 kcal/day is generally not recommended without medical supervision.
Why do nuts and almonds have fewer usable calories than their labels suggest?
Almond cell walls are rigid and resist digestion — about 20% of the fat in whole almonds passes through the gut unabsorbed. A USDA study found that almonds provide ~129 kcal per 28 g serving, not the 170 kcal on the label. Walnuts and pistachios show similar discrepancies of 5–20%. Food labels use standard Atwater factors that assume full digestibility, which overestimates usable energy for structurally intact whole foods like nuts, seeds, and legumes.
How many kcal are in one gram of fat, protein, and carbohydrate?
The Atwater system assigns 9 kcal per gram of fat, 4 kcal per gram of protein, and 4 kcal per gram of carbohydrate. Alcohol provides 7 kcal/g. These rounded values have been the basis of food labeling since the 1890s. Actual digestibility varies — fiber-rich carbohydrates yield fewer usable kcal because the body cannot fully break them down.
How many kcal does running a marathon burn?
A marathon (42.195 km) burns approximately 2,200–3,200 kcal depending on body weight, pace, and efficiency. A 70 kg runner typically burns about 2,600 kcal; an 85 kg runner about 3,100 kcal. That is roughly equivalent to 35 bananas or 13 slices of pizza. Elite runners complete the distance in about 2 hours, so their metabolic rate during the race exceeds 1,300 kcal/hour.
Why is the nutritional kilocalorie based on the International Table calorie rather than the thermochemical calorie?
The International Table calorie (4.1868 J) was adopted by the Fifth International Conference on Properties of Steam in 1956 and became the standard for engineering and nutrition. The thermochemical calorie (4.184 J) was standardized earlier for chemistry. Nutritionists chose the IT value because food energy intersects more with engineering standards (steam tables, heating) than pure chemistry. The 0.07% difference is negligible for dietary purposes.