Foot pounds-force second to Kilocalories (th)/minute

James Watt calculated that a mill horse could turn a mill wheel 144 times per hour, doing 32,572 ft·lbf of work per minute — he rounded up to 33,000 ft·lbf/min (550 ft·lbf/s) for marketing purposes. He wanted to sell steam engines by comparing them to horses, so he likely overestimated the horse to make his engines look like better value. A real horse sustains closer to 350–500 ft·lbf/s, so Watt's "1 HP" is actually more than one horse.

Power (ft·lbf/s) = Torque (ft·lbf) × RPM × 2π / 60. This is the workhorse formula (pun intended) of US mechanical engineering. For example, an engine producing 200 ft·lbf of torque at 3,000 RPM delivers 200 × 3,000 × 6.2832 / 60 = 62,832 ft·lbf/s ≈ 114 hp. The formula works because angular velocity in rad/s times torque in ft·lbf gives power directly in ft·lbf/s.

Pushing with 1 pound of force at 1 foot per second — roughly the effort of slowly sliding a light book across a table against friction. Lifting a 1-pound weight 1 foot in 1 second. Turning a doorknob with a very light touch. It's about 1.36 watts — enough to dimly light an LED. In human terms, it's almost effortless: casual walking produces about 50–80 ft·lbf/s of mechanical power, and you don't even notice.

Yes, particularly in ballistics (muzzle energy rates), mechanical testing (dynamometer output), agricultural machinery specs, and industrial equipment designed for the US market. However, even in the US, many engineering firms are switching to SI units for international compatibility. The automotive industry increasingly quotes power in both hp and kW. Aerospace has been mostly metric since the 1990s. Ft·lbf/s survives mainly in traditional mechanical and manufacturing industries.

Bullets are rated in ft·lbf of muzzle energy (not per second), but the power of a firearm is the muzzle energy divided by barrel time. A .308 rifle bullet exits with about 2,600 ft·lbf of energy over a barrel transit time of ~0.001 seconds, meaning the instantaneous power is roughly 2,600,000 ft·lbf/s (about 3,500 hp). That's why rifle recoil feels punchy — for a millisecond, you're absorbing the reaction force of a truck engine.

A MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) is the ratio of activity metabolic rate to resting metabolic rate. Sitting = 1 MET; walking = 3.5 METs; running = 8–12 METs. Researchers prefer METs because they normalize for body weight — a 50 kg woman and a 100 kg man both register 8 METs while running at the same pace, even though their raw kcal/min differ by 2×. This makes METs portable across populations. To get kcal/min from METs: multiply METs × body weight in kg × 0.0175. The Compendium of Physical Activities lists METs for over 800 activities, from accordion playing (1.8) to wrestling (6.0).

Cross-country skiing uphill can hit 15–20 kcal/min (1,050–1,400 W metabolic), making it one of the highest sustained metabolic rates in sport. Rowing and swimming at race pace reach 12–18 kcal/min. Cycling at elite level sustains 15–25 kcal/min. But the absolute champion is sprint running: Usain Bolt's 100m final produced roughly 80–100 kcal/min of metabolic power for 9.58 seconds. Of course, no one sustains that for long.

VO₂ max (maximum oxygen consumption) converts to kcal/min via the caloric equivalent of oxygen: 1 liter of O₂ consumed ≈ 5 kcal. An elite endurance athlete with VO₂ max of 80 mL/kg/min (70 kg person = 5.6 L/min) can sustain roughly 28 kcal/min at maximum effort. An untrained person at VO₂ max of 35 mL/kg/min maxes out around 12 kcal/min. This is why fit people can sustain higher power outputs — they literally process more oxygen.

Because their energy accounting is in kilocalories: food energy in kcal, basal metabolism in kcal/day, exercise expenditure in kcal/min. If a client eats 2,000 kcal and you want them to "burn 500 kcal," it's immediately useful to say "run at 10 kcal/min for 50 minutes." Saying "exercise at 700 W" is technically correct but meaningless to most clients. The kcal/min rate connects directly to the dietary energy balance equation.

Yes — EPOC (excess post-exercise oxygen consumption) is measured as elevated kcal/min above resting rate after exercise. After intense interval training, your metabolic rate might stay 0.2–0.5 kcal/min above baseline for 12–24 hours. That sounds tiny, but over 24 hours it adds up to 200–700 extra kcal — a meaningful amount. However, the fitness industry wildly oversells this: moderate exercise barely budges EPOC. You need truly brutal intensity to get a significant afterburn.