Horsepower (Water) to Horsepower (Electric)

Water HP = (Flow in GPM × Total Head in feet) / 3,960. The magic number 3,960 comes from the weight of water (8.33 lb/gal) × 33,000 ft·lbf/min per hp ÷ 8.33 × the appropriate conversions. For example: 200 GPM at 80 feet of head = 200 × 80 / 3,960 = 4.04 water hp. If the pump is 75% efficient, you need 4.04 / 0.75 = 5.39 shaft hp, so you'd select a 7.5 hp motor (next standard NEMA size up).

Because the motor must provide shaft hp, not water hp. If your application needs 3 water hp but the pump is only 65% efficient, you need 3 / 0.65 = 4.6 shaft hp — meaning a 5 hp motor minimum. Underestimating this gap leads to overloaded motors, overheating, and premature failure. Pump efficiency varies from 30% (tiny pumps) to 90% (large, well-designed centrifugal pumps), so the water-hp-to-shaft-hp gap ranges from 10% to 70%.

Water hp is the useful hydraulic output — the power actually delivered to the fluid as pressure and flow. Brake hp (bhp) is the shaft input power measured at the coupling. The ratio is pump efficiency: η = WHP / BHP. A pump rated at 10 bhp with 80% efficiency delivers 8 water hp; the other 2 hp is lost to friction, turbulence, and heat in the pump. When specifying pumps, you calculate the required water hp first, then divide by efficiency to find the necessary brake hp.

Rarely. International pump engineering uses kilowatts for both hydraulic power and shaft power. The formula becomes: Hydraulic Power (kW) = (Flow in m³/h × Head in meters × density × g) / 3,600,000. European pump catalogs list "hydraulic efficiency" as a percentage relating input kW to output kW. The concept is identical — water hp is just the US customary wrapper around it. If you see "water horsepower" in a specification, it's almost certainly an American or Canadian document.

Municipal water supply: 50–500 water hp per pump station. Oil pipeline pumping: 1,000–10,000 water hp per station. Mining dewatering: 100–5,000 water hp. Hydroelectric dam penstocks deliver thousands of water hp to turbines (in reverse — the water does the work). The largest single pump installations, like the pumps protecting New Orleans from flooding, can exceed 10,000 water hp each — moving millions of gallons per minute against levee heights.

It's a deliberate rounding for simplicity. The mechanical horsepower is 745.69987... watts — an ugly number for electrical calculations. The electric motor industry rounded to 746 W for clean nameplate ratings and straightforward calculations. The 0.04% difference is far below any motor's manufacturing tolerance. Some standards even use 750 W as an approximation. In practice, the distinction between 745.7 and 746 matters only to standards lawyers and unit conversion pedants.

Divide the hp rating by the motor efficiency and power factor. A 5 hp motor at 90% efficiency draws: 5 × 746 / 0.90 = 4,144 W of electrical power to deliver 3,730 W of shaft power. For three-phase motors, also divide by (√3 × voltage × power factor) to get amperage. Real-world efficiency ranges from 75% for small motors to 96% for large premium-efficiency ones. The nameplate always shows shaft output, not electrical input — a common source of confusion.

Because American homeowners and pool contractors have decades of experience sizing pumps in hp: "a 20,000-gallon pool needs a 1.5 hp pump" is ingrained knowledge. The Department of Energy actually mandated variable-speed pool pumps in 2021 and encouraged watt-based efficiency ratings, but manufacturers still prominently display hp because it drives purchasing decisions. A customer choosing between a 1 hp and 1.5 hp pump understands the difference intuitively; 746 W vs 1,119 W means nothing to them.

NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) defines standard motor sizes using electric hp: 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 3/4, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 75, 100 hp and up. These are standardized frame sizes — a 5 hp motor from any manufacturer fits the same mounting bolts. The hp(E) rating is the shaft output; NEMA also specifies efficiency classes (IE1 through IE4) that determine how much electrical power the motor actually consumes.

Not usually. EV manufacturers rate motors in kilowatts because the electrical connection is obvious and kW is internationally understood. A Tesla Model 3 motor is listed as 211 kW, not "283 hp(E)." However, marketing materials often convert to hp for American consumers: "283 horsepower" sounds sportier. Interestingly, EV motors are far more efficient (90–97%) than combustion engines (25–40%), so a 200 hp EV motor consumes far less total energy than a 200 hp gasoline engine.