Joules/hour to Joules/second
J/h
J/s
Conversion History
| Conversion | Reuse | Delete |
|---|---|---|
1 J/h (Joules/hour) → 0.000277777777777778 J/s (Joules/second) Just now |
Quick Reference Table (Joules/hour to Joules/second)
| Joules/hour (J/h) | Joules/second (J/s) |
|---|---|
| 3,600 | 1.0000000000000008 |
| 36,000 | 10.000000000000008 |
| 360,000 | 100.00000000000008 |
| 3,600,000 | 1,000.0000000000008 |
| 10,000,000 | 2,777.77777777778 |
| 36,000,000 | 10,000.000000000008 |
About Joules/hour (J/h)
Joules per hour (J/h) is a very low power unit, equivalent to approximately 0.000278 watts. It is used in precision calorimetry, passive building heat loss calculations, and biological heat flux measurements where the energy exchange over hours is more meaningful than per-second rates. One watt equals 3,600 J/h. The unit is occasionally seen in nutrition science and environmental physiology, where energy budgets are tracked over hours.
A sleeping mouse dissipates roughly 720,000 J/h (~200 W/kg) due to its high surface-area-to-volume ratio. A well-insulated house loses about 36,000,000 J/h (10 kW) on a cold winter day.
About Joules/second (J/s)
Joules per second (J/s) is the dimensional expression of power in the SI system, and is exactly equivalent to the watt by definition. While "watt" is the named unit used in practice, J/s appears in physics derivations, dimensional analysis, and engineering calculations where explicit unit tracking is required. Seeing power written as J/s emphasizes the energy-per-time nature of the quantity and connects power directly to the joule and second without introducing a derived unit name.
A 100 W light bulb consumes 100 J/s of electrical energy. A person climbing stairs at moderate pace expends roughly 300 J/s of mechanical power.
Joules/hour – Frequently Asked Questions
Why use joules per hour instead of just watts?
When you're tracking energy budgets over hours — passive house heat loss, slow battery self-discharge, biological calorimetry — expressing rates in J/h matches the timescale of your measurements. A passive house losing 36 MJ/h is more intuitive to a building physicist than "10 kW" because they're calculating daily heat budgets in megajoules. It's a unit of convenience, not necessity.
How does joules per hour relate to kilowatt-hours?
One kWh = 3,600,000 J, so 3,600,000 J/h = 1 kW. The relationship is elegantly circular: if you consume 3.6 MJ/h of power, you use exactly 1 kWh of energy each hour. This makes J/h a natural bridge unit between the SI energy world (joules) and the practical electricity billing world (kWh). Multiply J/h by hours and you get joules of total energy; divide by 3,600,000 and you get kWh.
What is the heat loss of a well-insulated building in joules per hour?
A Passivhaus-certified building targets heat loss below 54 MJ/h (15 W/m² × 1,000 m² for a typical house). A standard older home might lose 180–360 MJ/h (50–100 kW) on a cold day. The difference is dramatic: triple glazing, 300mm insulation, and air-tightness can reduce heat loss by 80%. Building energy certificates in some countries express this in kWh/m²/year, but the underlying calculation uses J/h or W.
How many joules per hour does a human radiate while sleeping?
About 230,000–290,000 J/h (65–80 W). This drops from your waking basal rate of ~290,000–360,000 J/h (80–100 W) because metabolic rate falls 10–15% during sleep. The heat warms your bed and room measurably — two people sleeping together can raise bedroom temperature by 1–2°C overnight in a small, well-insulated room. It's why you wake up warm even without the heating on.
Is J/h used in any standards or building codes?
Not directly — most building codes use watts per square meter (W/m²) or kWh/m²/year for energy performance ratings. However, the underlying heat transfer calculations in standards like ISO 13790 effectively compute in J/h when assessing hourly energy balances. Some German and Swiss engineering tools output intermediate results in kJ/h or MJ/h. The unit lives in the calculation layer, even if the final certificate uses more familiar units.
Joules/second – Frequently Asked Questions
Why would anyone write joules per second instead of watts?
In dimensional analysis and physics derivations, writing J/s keeps the units transparent — you can see exactly what's being divided and multiplied. If you're calculating power as force × velocity (N·m/s = J/s), keeping it as J/s avoids a mental leap. Students and textbook authors prefer it when teaching the concept of power, because "energy per time" is more intuitive than a named unit. Once you understand it, you switch to watts for brevity.
Is joules per second used in any official standards or regulations?
The SI system officially defines the watt as the named unit for power, with J/s as its definition. In metrology documents and BIPM publications, you'll see W = J/s = kg·m²/s³. Some ISO standards for calorimetry and heat flow measurements express power in J/s to maintain consistency with energy measurements also given in joules. In practice, scientific papers in thermodynamics and physical chemistry often prefer J/s for clarity.
How does expressing power as J/s help in physics problem solving?
It makes unit cancellation visible. If you know a machine delivers 500 J of work over 10 seconds, writing 500 J ÷ 10 s = 50 J/s is a complete, self-checking calculation. Converting immediately to "50 W" obscures the path. In thermodynamics, where you track joules of heat, joules of work, and joules per second of power flow, keeping J/s prevents sign and unit errors that plague students.
What is the relationship between J/s and other compound SI units?
J/s = W = V·A = kg·m²/s³. Each form has its domain: electrical engineers think V·A, mechanical engineers think N·m/s, and physicists think kg·m²/s³. The beauty of SI is that they're all identical. A volt is a J/C, an ampere is C/s, so V·A = J/C × C/s = J/s. This chain of definitions means you can derive any electrical quantity from mass, length, time, and current.
Are there situations where J/s and watts give different numbers?
Never — they are exactly identical by definition, with zero rounding or conversion error. 1 J/s = 1 W, always. This is unlike, say, calories per second vs. watts, where a conversion factor (4.184) introduces potential rounding issues. The equivalence is definitional, not empirical. If someone claims a difference exists, they're confusing joules per second with some other energy-per-time unit like calories per second or BTU per hour.