Kilocalories (th)/minute to Terawatt
kcal/min
TW
Conversion History
| Conversion | Reuse | Delete |
|---|---|---|
1 kcal/min (Kilocalories (th)/minute) → 6.973333333e-11 TW (Terawatt) Just now |
Quick Reference Table (Kilocalories (th)/minute to Terawatt)
| Kilocalories (th)/minute (kcal/min) | Terawatt (TW) |
|---|---|
| 0.5 | 0.00000000003486666667 |
| 1 | 0.00000000006973333333 |
| 3 | 0.0000000002092 |
| 5 | 0.00000000034866666667 |
| 10 | 0.00000000069733333333 |
| 15 | 0.000000001046 |
| 20 | 0.00000000139466666667 |
About Kilocalories (th)/minute (kcal/min)
Kilocalories (thermochemical) per minute (kcal/min) equals approximately 69.7 watts and is a unit commonly encountered in exercise physiology and sports science to express metabolic rate during physical activity. Oxygen consumption (VO₂) data is often converted to kcal/min to describe energy expenditure. One MET (metabolic equivalent of task) for an average adult corresponds to roughly 1 kcal/min at rest; vigorous exercise reaches 10–15 kcal/min.
Resting metabolic rate is about 1 kcal/min (70 W). Competitive cycling at race pace can reach 15–20 kcal/min (~1,050–1,400 W) of total metabolic output.
About Terawatt (TW)
A terawatt (TW) equals one trillion watts and is used to express global and continental energy consumption and total planetary power flux. Total human civilisation energy consumption is approximately 18 TW. The Sun delivers about 173,000 TW of power to the Earth's surface. National electricity grids operate at tens of gigawatts; continental-scale grids and global energy statistics require terawatt-scale framing. Ambitious long-term energy transition scenarios describe targets in terawatts of clean capacity.
Global electricity generation capacity is approximately 9 TW. Total human energy use (all forms — electricity, heat, transport) is about 18 TW.
Kilocalories (th)/minute – Frequently Asked Questions
What is a MET and why do exercise researchers prefer it over raw kcal/min?
A MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) is the ratio of activity metabolic rate to resting metabolic rate. Sitting = 1 MET; walking = 3.5 METs; running = 8–12 METs. Researchers prefer METs because they normalize for body weight — a 50 kg woman and a 100 kg man both register 8 METs while running at the same pace, even though their raw kcal/min differ by 2×. This makes METs portable across populations. To get kcal/min from METs: multiply METs × body weight in kg × 0.0175. The Compendium of Physical Activities lists METs for over 800 activities, from accordion playing (1.8) to wrestling (6.0).
What exercise burns the most kcal/min?
Cross-country skiing uphill can hit 15–20 kcal/min (1,050–1,400 W metabolic), making it one of the highest sustained metabolic rates in sport. Rowing and swimming at race pace reach 12–18 kcal/min. Cycling at elite level sustains 15–25 kcal/min. But the absolute champion is sprint running: Usain Bolt's 100m final produced roughly 80–100 kcal/min of metabolic power for 9.58 seconds. Of course, no one sustains that for long.
How does VO₂ max relate to kcal/min?
VO₂ max (maximum oxygen consumption) converts to kcal/min via the caloric equivalent of oxygen: 1 liter of O₂ consumed ≈ 5 kcal. An elite endurance athlete with VO₂ max of 80 mL/kg/min (70 kg person = 5.6 L/min) can sustain roughly 28 kcal/min at maximum effort. An untrained person at VO₂ max of 35 mL/kg/min maxes out around 12 kcal/min. This is why fit people can sustain higher power outputs — they literally process more oxygen.
Why do nutritionists prefer kcal/min over watts for exercise?
Because their energy accounting is in kilocalories: food energy in kcal, basal metabolism in kcal/day, exercise expenditure in kcal/min. If a client eats 2,000 kcal and you want them to "burn 500 kcal," it's immediately useful to say "run at 10 kcal/min for 50 minutes." Saying "exercise at 700 W" is technically correct but meaningless to most clients. The kcal/min rate connects directly to the dietary energy balance equation.
Is the "afterburn effect" measured in kcal/min?
Yes — EPOC (excess post-exercise oxygen consumption) is measured as elevated kcal/min above resting rate after exercise. After intense interval training, your metabolic rate might stay 0.2–0.5 kcal/min above baseline for 12–24 hours. That sounds tiny, but over 24 hours it adds up to 200–700 extra kcal — a meaningful amount. However, the fitness industry wildly oversells this: moderate exercise barely budges EPOC. You need truly brutal intensity to get a significant afterburn.
Terawatt – Frequently Asked Questions
How much of the Sun's power hitting Earth would we need to capture?
The Sun delivers about 173,000 TW to Earth's surface. Human civilisation uses roughly 18 TW total. So we'd only need to capture 0.01% of incoming solar energy to power everything — an area of solar panels roughly 400 km × 400 km, about the size of Montana. The challenge isn't total energy availability; it's cost, storage, transmission, and the fact that sunlight is spread thin and intermittent.
What does 18 terawatts of human power consumption actually mean?
Imagine 18 trillion light bulbs burning continuously, or 9 billion people each running a 2 kW heater non-stop. That 18 TW figure includes everything — electricity, transport fuel, industrial heat, cooking, heating. About 40% comes from oil, 27% from coal, 24% from gas, and the rest from nuclear and renewables. The US alone accounts for about 3 TW despite having only 4% of world population.
How many terawatts of solar would end climate change?
Replacing all 18 TW of human energy with clean sources would require roughly 60–75 TW of installed solar capacity (accounting for ~25% average capacity factor). That's about 40 times current installed solar. At 2023 installation rates of ~0.4 TW/year, it would take 150 years — but installation rates are doubling every 2–3 years. If that exponential trend holds, we could theoretically reach 60 TW of solar within 15–20 years.
What is Earth's total internal heat flow in terawatts?
Earth radiates about 47 TW of geothermal heat from its interior, driven by radioactive decay and residual primordial heat. That's 2.5× human energy consumption, but it's spread across the entire surface at extremely low density (~0.09 W/m²). Iceland, sitting atop a mantle plume, exploits geothermal for 90% of its heating. Globally, geothermal electricity capacity is only about 16 GW — a tiny fraction of what's theoretically available.
Has human power consumption always been measured in terawatts?
No — the terawatt scale is a very recent phenomenon. In 1800, global human power consumption was about 0.5 TW (mostly biomass burning). By 1900 it reached 1 TW with coal industrialisation. We crossed 10 TW around 1985. The jump from 1 to 18 TW in just 120 years tracks almost perfectly with global population growth times rising per-capita energy use. Pre-industrial humans used about 0.1 kW each; Americans now average 10 kW per person.