Megawatt to Calories (th)/minute

In the US, roughly 750–1,000 homes (average consumption ~1.2 kW per home). In Europe, where usage is lower, 1 MW can serve 1,500–2,000 homes. But this is average — on a hot summer afternoon when everyone cranks AC, that number can drop to 300–400 homes. Grid planners must size for peak demand, not averages, which is why installed capacity far exceeds average load.

A small data center uses 1–5 MW; a large hyperscale facility (Google, AWS, Microsoft) draws 50–200 MW — some exceeding 300 MW. The entire US data center industry consumed about 17 GW in 2023, roughly 4% of national electricity. AI training clusters are pushing demand higher: a single large GPU cluster can draw 50–100 MW, and planned AI-focused campuses target 1 GW or more.

Onshore turbines typically rate 2–6 MW; the latest offshore monsters reach 14–16 MW per turbine. Vestas' V236-15.0 MW turbine has a rotor diameter of 236 meters — wider than two football fields. A single sweep of its blades can generate enough electricity for a UK household for two days. Capacity factors run 25–45% onshore and 40–55% offshore, so actual average output is roughly half the nameplate rating.

Most operating reactors produce 500–1,400 MW of electrical power. The world's largest, at France's Gravelines plant, has six reactors totalling 5,460 MW. Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) being developed target 50–300 MW each. Nuclear plants run at 85–95% capacity factor — far higher than wind (~35%) or solar (~25%) — meaning a 1,000 MW reactor actually delivers about 900 MW on average.

MW tells you the maximum instantaneous power the battery can deliver (how fast it can discharge), while MWh tells you total stored energy (how long it can sustain that output). A 100 MW / 400 MWh battery can deliver 100 MW for 4 hours, or 50 MW for 8 hours. Grid operators care about both: MW for handling sudden demand spikes, MWh for sustained backup during extended outages or evening solar fade.

Running at 10 km/h burns about 8,000–12,000 cal(th)/min (8–12 kcal/min) depending on body weight — that's roughly 560–840 W of total metabolic power. Sprinting can hit 25,000 cal/min briefly. But here's the catch: only 20–25% becomes mechanical work; the rest is heat, which is why you get hot. A 70 kg runner at marathon pace (~12 km/h) burns roughly 12,000 cal/min and must dissipate about 700 W of waste heat through sweating.

Before SI standardisation, the calorie was the dominant energy unit in biology because it was defined by water's heat capacity — and most biological calorimetry involved water baths. Measuring oxygen consumption in liters per minute and converting to cal/min via the caloric equivalent of oxygen (4.825 kcal/L O₂) was standard practice. The per-minute rate matched the natural timescale of spirometry measurements. Modern papers have mostly switched to watts, but the older literature is vast.

Metabolic rate scales with body mass to the 0.75 power (Kleiber's law). A 3 g mouse produces about 36 cal/min; a 70 kg human about 1,200 cal/min; a 5,000 kg elephant about 30,000 cal/min. Per kilogram, the mouse is 12× more metabolically active than the elephant. This is why small animals eat constantly and have rapid heartbeats — they burn through their energy reserves much faster relative to their size.

In the late 1800s, Wilbur Atwater burned thousands of food samples in a bomb calorimeter — a sealed steel vessel submerged in water — and measured the temperature rise in cal/min to calculate total energy. He then subtracted energy lost in digestion (measured via feces and urine calorimetry) to derive the "physiological fuel values": 4 cal/g for protein, 4 cal/g for carbohydrate, 9 cal/g for fat. These Atwater factors, over 120 years old, are still the basis for every nutrition label worldwide — remarkably accurate despite their crude origin.

Most wrist-based trackers are 15–30% off for cal/min estimates — some studies found errors up to 93%. They estimate from heart rate, which correlates loosely with metabolic rate but is confounded by temperature, caffeine, stress, and fitness level. Chest-strap heart monitors are better (10–15% error). Gold standard is indirect calorimetry with a face mask measuring O₂ and CO₂, accurate to about 3%. For most people, tracker estimates are directionally useful but not precise.