Terawatt to Foot pounds-force second
TW
ft·lbf/s
Conversion History
| Conversion | Reuse | Delete |
|---|---|---|
1 TW (Terawatt) → 737562149275.26366911676599943664 ft·lbf/s (Foot pounds-force second) Just now |
Quick Reference Table (Terawatt to Foot pounds-force second)
| Terawatt (TW) | Foot pounds-force second (ft·lbf/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.001 | 737,562,149.27526366911676599944 |
| 0.01 | 7,375,621,492.75263669116765999437 |
| 0.1 | 73,756,214,927.52636691167659994366 |
| 1 | 737,562,149,275.26366911676599943664 |
| 9 | 6,638,059,343,477.37302205089399492976 |
| 18 | 13,276,118,686,954.74604410178798985952 |
| 173,000 | 127,598,251,824,620,614.7572005179025386751 |
About Terawatt (TW)
A terawatt (TW) equals one trillion watts and is used to express global and continental energy consumption and total planetary power flux. Total human civilisation energy consumption is approximately 18 TW. The Sun delivers about 173,000 TW of power to the Earth's surface. National electricity grids operate at tens of gigawatts; continental-scale grids and global energy statistics require terawatt-scale framing. Ambitious long-term energy transition scenarios describe targets in terawatts of clean capacity.
Global electricity generation capacity is approximately 9 TW. Total human energy use (all forms — electricity, heat, transport) is about 18 TW.
About Foot pounds-force second (ft·lbf/s)
Foot pounds-force per second (ft·lbf/s) is the fundamental mechanical power unit in the US customary system, equal to approximately 1.356 watts. It is the rate of doing work when a force of one pound-force moves through one foot per second. The unit is directly related to the mechanical horsepower: one horsepower equals exactly 550 ft·lbf/s. It appears in US mechanical engineering, ballistics, and machinery design texts.
One mechanical horsepower equals 550 ft·lbf/s (~746 W). A person climbing stairs moderately expends about 200–300 ft·lbf/s of mechanical power.
Terawatt – Frequently Asked Questions
How much of the Sun's power hitting Earth would we need to capture?
The Sun delivers about 173,000 TW to Earth's surface. Human civilisation uses roughly 18 TW total. So we'd only need to capture 0.01% of incoming solar energy to power everything — an area of solar panels roughly 400 km × 400 km, about the size of Montana. The challenge isn't total energy availability; it's cost, storage, transmission, and the fact that sunlight is spread thin and intermittent.
What does 18 terawatts of human power consumption actually mean?
Imagine 18 trillion light bulbs burning continuously, or 9 billion people each running a 2 kW heater non-stop. That 18 TW figure includes everything — electricity, transport fuel, industrial heat, cooking, heating. About 40% comes from oil, 27% from coal, 24% from gas, and the rest from nuclear and renewables. The US alone accounts for about 3 TW despite having only 4% of world population.
How many terawatts of solar would end climate change?
Replacing all 18 TW of human energy with clean sources would require roughly 60–75 TW of installed solar capacity (accounting for ~25% average capacity factor). That's about 40 times current installed solar. At 2023 installation rates of ~0.4 TW/year, it would take 150 years — but installation rates are doubling every 2–3 years. If that exponential trend holds, we could theoretically reach 60 TW of solar within 15–20 years.
What is Earth's total internal heat flow in terawatts?
Earth radiates about 47 TW of geothermal heat from its interior, driven by radioactive decay and residual primordial heat. That's 2.5× human energy consumption, but it's spread across the entire surface at extremely low density (~0.09 W/m²). Iceland, sitting atop a mantle plume, exploits geothermal for 90% of its heating. Globally, geothermal electricity capacity is only about 16 GW — a tiny fraction of what's theoretically available.
Has human power consumption always been measured in terawatts?
No — the terawatt scale is a very recent phenomenon. In 1800, global human power consumption was about 0.5 TW (mostly biomass burning). By 1900 it reached 1 TW with coal industrialisation. We crossed 10 TW around 1985. The jump from 1 to 18 TW in just 120 years tracks almost perfectly with global population growth times rising per-capita energy use. Pre-industrial humans used about 0.1 kW each; Americans now average 10 kW per person.
Foot pounds-force second – Frequently Asked Questions
Why is horsepower defined as exactly 550 ft·lbf/s?
James Watt calculated that a mill horse could turn a mill wheel 144 times per hour, doing 32,572 ft·lbf of work per minute — he rounded up to 33,000 ft·lbf/min (550 ft·lbf/s) for marketing purposes. He wanted to sell steam engines by comparing them to horses, so he likely overestimated the horse to make his engines look like better value. A real horse sustains closer to 350–500 ft·lbf/s, so Watt's "1 HP" is actually more than one horse.
How do you calculate ft·lbf/s from torque and RPM?
Power (ft·lbf/s) = Torque (ft·lbf) × RPM × 2π / 60. This is the workhorse formula (pun intended) of US mechanical engineering. For example, an engine producing 200 ft·lbf of torque at 3,000 RPM delivers 200 × 3,000 × 6.2832 / 60 = 62,832 ft·lbf/s ≈ 114 hp. The formula works because angular velocity in rad/s times torque in ft·lbf gives power directly in ft·lbf/s.
What everyday forces produce 1 ft·lbf/s of power?
Pushing with 1 pound of force at 1 foot per second — roughly the effort of slowly sliding a light book across a table against friction. Lifting a 1-pound weight 1 foot in 1 second. Turning a doorknob with a very light touch. It's about 1.36 watts — enough to dimly light an LED. In human terms, it's almost effortless: casual walking produces about 50–80 ft·lbf/s of mechanical power, and you don't even notice.
Is ft·lbf/s still used in modern American engineering?
Yes, particularly in ballistics (muzzle energy rates), mechanical testing (dynamometer output), agricultural machinery specs, and industrial equipment designed for the US market. However, even in the US, many engineering firms are switching to SI units for international compatibility. The automotive industry increasingly quotes power in both hp and kW. Aerospace has been mostly metric since the 1990s. Ft·lbf/s survives mainly in traditional mechanical and manufacturing industries.
How does ft·lbf/s relate to bullet kinetic energy?
Bullets are rated in ft·lbf of muzzle energy (not per second), but the power of a firearm is the muzzle energy divided by barrel time. A .308 rifle bullet exits with about 2,600 ft·lbf of energy over a barrel transit time of ~0.001 seconds, meaning the instantaneous power is roughly 2,600,000 ft·lbf/s (about 3,500 hp). That's why rifle recoil feels punchy — for a millisecond, you're absorbing the reaction force of a truck engine.