Curie to Rutherford
Ci
Rd
Conversion History
| Conversion | Reuse | Delete |
|---|---|---|
1 Ci (Curie) → 37000.000000000037 Rd (Rutherford) Just now |
Quick Reference Table (Curie to Rutherford)
| Curie (Ci) | Rutherford (Rd) |
|---|---|
| 0.001 | 37.000000000000037 |
| 0.01 | 370.00000000000037 |
| 0.1 | 3,700.0000000000037 |
| 1 | 37,000.000000000037 |
| 10 | 370,000.00000000037 |
| 100 | 3,700,000.0000000037 |
| 1,000 | 37,000,000.000000037 |
About Curie (Ci)
The curie (Ci) equals 3.7 × 10¹⁰ disintegrations per second — the activity of one gram of radium-226. It was the dominant unit of radioactivity for most of the 20th century, before the becquerel was adopted by SI in 1975. The curie remains in widespread use in the United States, particularly in nuclear medicine, radiation safety licensing, and the nuclear power industry. A typical nuclear power reactor fuel assembly has an initial activity of thousands of curies per kilogram; spent fuel cooling pools contain millions of curies of fission products. Radioactive material transport regulations specify curie thresholds for package categories. One curie is approximately 27 GBq, making it a large unit compared to everyday sources.
One gram of Ra-226 has exactly 1 Ci of activity. A Co-60 teletherapy head used for cancer treatment historically contained 1,000–10,000 Ci at commissioning.
Etymology: Named after Marie Curie (1867–1934) and Pierre Curie (1859–1906) by the Radiology Congress in 1910, one year after Pierre's death. Marie Curie discovered polonium and radium, and pioneered quantitative work on radioactivity — a term she coined. She remains the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different sciences (Physics 1903, Chemistry 1911).
About Rutherford (Rd)
The rutherford (Rd) is an obsolete non-SI unit of radioactive activity equal to one million disintegrations per second — exactly 10⁶ Bq or 1 MBq. It was proposed in the 1940s as a more practical middle ground between the very small becquerel and the very large curie, and was briefly used in some European nuclear physics literature. The rutherford never gained wide adoption and was superseded by the becquerel when the SI system standardized radioactivity units in 1975. It now appears only in historical documents and unit conversion tools. The prefix system (kilorutherford, megarutherford) was also proposed but never standardized, and the unit is considered fully obsolete in modern scientific and regulatory contexts.
One rutherford equals exactly 1 MBq — the activity typical of a single nuclear medicine dose unit of a short-lived diagnostic isotope. The unit is no longer used in practice.
Etymology: Named after Ernest Rutherford (1871–1937), New Zealand-born physicist who established the nuclear model of the atom, discovered alpha and beta radiation types, and first achieved artificial nuclear transmutation. He won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1908. The unit proposed in his honor was formally obsoleted in 1975.
Curie – Frequently Asked Questions
Why was the curie originally defined as the activity of one gram of radium?
When Marie and Pierre Curie isolated radium in the early 1900s, it became the reference standard for radioactivity because it was the most intensely radioactive substance known and could be weighed on a balance. The Radiology Congress of 1910 defined the curie as the activity of one gram of Ra-226 — roughly 3.7 × 10¹⁰ disintegrations per second. That number was not chosen for mathematical elegance; it simply fell out of radium's half-life and atomic mass. It is one of the few scientific units defined by a specific lump of material rather than an abstract principle.
How does one curie compare to the radioactivity in everyday objects?
One curie is enormous by everyday standards. A human body contains about 0.1 microcuries of K-40 — one ten-millionth of a curie. A smoke detector holds about 1 microcurie. To reach one full curie of K-40, you would need roughly 140 kilograms of pure potassium. Conversely, a single spent nuclear fuel rod can contain millions of curies. The curie was designed for the world of radium laboratories and nuclear reactors; for anything you encounter in daily life, the microcurie or picocurie is the appropriate scale.
Is the curie still legally accepted for regulatory purposes in the United States?
Yes. The NRC, DOE, DOT, and EPA all accept curie-based units in filings, license applications, and transport documents. While 10 CFR Part 20 lists dose limits in both rem and sievert, the curie remains the default activity unit in most US regulatory practice. License conditions specify possession limits in millicuries or curies; transport labels use the Type A₂ values in curies; and waste manifests record activity in curie-based units. The US is unlikely to mandate a switch to becquerels without a broader metrication push that no one in Washington is championing.
What did Marie Curie actually carry around that exposed her to so much radiation?
Marie Curie personally processed tonnes of pitchblende ore to isolate fractions of a gram of radium salts — which she stored in her desk drawer and carried in her coat pocket. Her notebooks from the 1890s are still so contaminated with Ra-226 that they are kept in lead-lined boxes at the Bibliothèque nationale de France, and researchers must sign a liability waiver and wear protective clothing to view them. She died in 1934 of aplastic anaemia, almost certainly caused by decades of unshielded exposure to alpha, beta, and gamma radiation from radium, polonium, and radon gas in her poorly ventilated laboratory.
Why is 37 gigabecquerels such an oddly specific number for one curie?
It is not oddly specific — it is just 3.7 × 10¹⁰ Bq, the measured disintegration rate of one gram of Ra-226 rounded to two significant figures. When the curie was standardized in 1910, they measured radium's activity as precisely as they could and pinned the unit to that number. Later, more precise measurements showed the actual activity of one gram of Ra-226 is closer to 3.66 × 10¹⁰ dps, but the curie was redefined as exactly 3.7 × 10¹⁰ dps to keep the number clean. So the curie no longer exactly matches one gram of radium — it is off by about 1%.
Rutherford – Frequently Asked Questions
Why did the rutherford unit fail to catch on when it seems like a sensible middle ground?
The rutherford was proposed in the 1940s when the curie was the only game in town and was inconveniently large for many lab measurements. At 10⁶ dps (1 MBq), the rutherford sat in a useful range. But the 1975 SI reform chose the becquerel (1 dps) as the base unit with standard SI prefixes — kBq, MBq, GBq — which covered every scale. Having both the rutherford and the megabecquerel for the same quantity was redundant. The scientific community picked one, and the rutherford quietly disappeared from everything except unit conversion tables and physics trivia.
Who was Ernest Rutherford and why does nuclear physics owe him so much?
Rutherford discovered the atomic nucleus by firing alpha particles at gold foil (1911), identified alpha and beta radiation as distinct particle types, and performed the first artificial nuclear transmutation — turning nitrogen into oxygen — in 1917. He won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1908, which famously annoyed him because he considered himself a physicist. His students went on to split the atom (Cockcroft and Walton) and discover the neutron (Chadwick). Nearly every branch of nuclear science traces back to his Manchester and Cambridge laboratories.
Are there other obsolete radioactivity units besides the rutherford?
Several. The stat (1 disintegration per second, identical to the becquerel but proposed earlier), the eman (used for radon concentration in water, equal to 10⁻¹⁰ Ci/L), and the mache unit (another radon measure used in Austrian and German spa water literature) are all effectively extinct. The curie itself is technically obsolete under SI but persists through sheer institutional momentum in the US. The pattern is typical of measurement science: every era invents its own units, and standardisation eventually consolidates them.
If 1 rutherford equals 1 MBq, could someone accidentally confuse the two in old literature?
Unlikely in practice because the rutherford disappeared from active use by the 1970s, before the megabecquerel entered common parlance in the 1980s. You would only encounter the rutherford in papers from roughly 1946–1970, primarily in European nuclear physics journals. If you see "Rd" in a modern unit conversion tool, it is there for completeness and historical interest, not because anyone is publishing in rutherfords. The real risk of confusion in old literature is between the curie and the becquerel, where a missing prefix can mean a billionfold error.
What is the strangest or most obscure unit of radioactivity ever proposed?
The "sunshine unit" — officially the strontium unit — was coined by the US Atomic Energy Commission in the 1950s to describe strontium-90 concentration in bones and milk during nuclear weapons testing. One sunshine unit equalled 1 picocurie of Sr-90 per gram of calcium. The name was a deliberate PR choice to make fallout contamination sound cheerful and harmless. It backfired spectacularly when journalists mocked it as Orwellian doublespeak, and the term was quietly dropped in favor of pCi/g Ca. It remains a cautionary tale about naming units for political rather than scientific reasons.